Google collections and enhanced JavaBeans
I’m a big fan of Google Collections. Functions and Predicates became my best friends to make Java’s syntax a bit functional-like. I like writing things like:
List<Contact> contacts = ...
List<String> toStrings = Lists.transform(contacts, Functions.toStringFunction());and with the help of static imports:
List<String> toStrings = transform(contacts, toStringFunction());If you use out-of-the-box Functions and Predicates, it’s a lot of fun. Now, let’s say, you want something more useful like:
List<String> names = transform(contacts, Contact.T0_NAME);you need to accommodate with Java’s way of writing functions. That is write an inner class:
public class Contact {
...
public static Function<Contact, String> TO_NAME = new Function<Contact, String> {
public String apply(Contact contact) {
return contact.getName();
}
}It’s ok for one bean property, but writing functions for all of them is a lot of work.
What if we could write a JavaBean that would generate all these functions for us. Something like that:
public class Contact extends AbstractBean<Contact> {
public static final StringProperty<Contact> NAME = stringValue();
public static final IntegerProperty<Contact> AGE = integerValue();
public static final StringProperty<Contact> EMAIL = stringValue();
public Contact(String name, int age, String email) {
super(NAME, name, AGE, age, EMAIL, email);
}
public String getName() {
return get(NAME);
}
public Integer getAge() {
return get(AGE);
}
public String getEmail() {
return get(EMAIL);
}
}Now, every property of my bean is also a Function converting a bean instance to it’s property value. To be clear:
Contact.NAME is a Function<Contact, String>
Contact.AGE is a Function<Contact, Integer>
Contact.EMAIL is a Function<Contact, String>so that I can write:
List<Contact> contacts = ...
List<String> names = transform(contacts, Contact.NAME);
List<Integer> ages = transform(contacts, Contact.AGE);Nice isn’t it?
Now, it can be even cooler. I can write something like that:
Iterable<Contact> david = filter(contacts, NAME.isEqualTo("david"));
... adults = filter(contacts, AGE.isGreaterThan(18));
... babies = filter(contacts, NAME.isEqualTo("baby").and(AGE.isLessThan(1)));My bean properties are also Predicate factories!
With a custom utility class, I can even use a clearer syntax that Google Collection’s:
... ages = with(contacts).keep(NAME.isEqualTo("david")).to(AGE).list();There are even more features. All AbstractBeans come with free equals(), hashCode() and compare().
The last neat feature is the ability to write a builder for any bean easily, with only one additional method:
public class Contact extends AbstractBean<Contact> {
...
static <V> BeanBuilder<Contact> with(BeanProperty<Contact, V> property, V value) {
return new BeanBuilder<Contact>() {
public Contact createBean(PropertyValues<Contact> values) {
return new Contact(values.get(Contact.NAME), values.get(Contact.AGE));
}
}.with(property, value);
}Now, I can write something like this:
Contact contact = with(NAME, "david").with(AGE, 34).with(EMAIL, "d@g.net").build();Note, that all of the features are statically typed and don’t use reflection.
What do you think?
