Comments for Java Bien!

Comment on Unit test verbosity by Skirmantas Kligys

Skirmantas Kligys — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 04:38:23 +0000

Most likely because of management tracking lines of code per developer. You get what you measure, not what you want.

Comment on Unit test verbosity by Johan Martinsson

Johan Martinsson — Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:23:39 +0000

Sad is the word. Though I find it quite funny (I suppose the further away you are the funnier it gets …)

I’m wondering what kind of reasons there can be for sucha a situation. I’m not sure sheer incompetence of one developer is sufficient. Got any ideas David?

Comment on Unit test verbosity by JB.L

JB.L — Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:00:12 +0000

My I suggest you submit this code to TheDailyWtf.com ? This snippet sounds like a good fit for their already huge collection of WTFy code

Comment on Unit test verbosity by Eric

Eric — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:31:05 +0000

I end up with

@Test
public void can_obtain_a_customer_by_account_id() throws Exception {
assertEquals(“ABC99″, serviceImpl.getCustomer(“ABC99″).getAccountId());
}

Comment on Unit test verbosity by Eric

Eric — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:30:17 +0000

My detailed response, with intermediate steps: http://ericlefevre.net/wordpress/2012/01/27/cleaning-up-test-code/

Comment on Unit test verbosity by Pierre Laporte

Pierre Laporte — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:03:50 +0000

My bad :

- the exception logs only print the message which is already printed by the fail method, but does not print the stacktrace.

Comment on Unit test verbosity by Pierre Laporte

Pierre Laporte — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:01:42 +0000

Imho, the saddest thing in this code, is that the log does not contain any relevant information. It just create noise :
- the first line give no information since maven already produce a per-method summary
- the exception logs only print the message and not the stacktrace, which is already printed by the fail method
- the last line does not tell that the test is successful even if it’s the only possible case

Comment on Unit test verbosity by Cleaning up test code | Eric Lefevre-Ardant on Java & Agile

Cleaning up test code | Eric Lefevre-Ardant on Java & Agile — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:52:08 +0000

[...] former colleague David just posted an example of verbose test code on his blog (the parts in French have been translated to English by [...]

Comment on Unit test verbosity by JP

JP — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:24:42 +0000

@Test
public void testGetCustomerOK() {
Assert.assertEquals(“Les accountId doivent être identiques.”,
“ABC99″, this.serviceImpl.getCustomer(“ABC99″).getAccountId());
}

Comment on Code Story – Devoxx France by Devoxx France 2012 et Code Story « Sébastien Prunier

Devoxx France 2012 et Code Story « Sébastien Prunier — Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:53:00 +0000

[...] Le blog de David Gageot : http://blog.javabien.net/2011/11/17/codestory/ [...]

Comment on Code Story – Devoxx France by Mourad Najar

Mourad Najar — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:51:08 +0000

Si on est schyzo est ce que ça compte quand même comme un binome ou pas ?
Je sais pas si je peux combattre ma phobie sociale même pour coder avec l’illustre Barbe Rousse !

Comment on Devoxx France by Cédric Champeau

Cédric Champeau — Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:51:11 +0000

@David Gageot Ok, dans ce cas, il serait pas mal, si vous avez une implémentation de référence of course, de disposer de la liste complète des résultats de 1 à 100, parce qu’il reste une part d’interprétation, je n’avais pas compris ça. Implémentation Groovy corrigée sur GitHub

Comment on Devoxx France by David Gageot

David Gageot — Fri, 18 Nov 2011 01:55:56 +0000

oui

Comment on Devoxx France by Fred

Fred — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:14:34 +0000

Il est mentionné “Votre code doit tourner dans une JVM”, c.a.d que le code compilé doit tourner dans une JVM ?
Ca ouvre donc la porte aux langages “JVM-based” (Groovy, Scala, Clojure …) ?

Comment on Devoxx France by David Gageot

David Gageot — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:11:31 +0000

Non, c’est bien Foo. Implicitement, s’il y a au moins une substitution, le nombre original n’est pas affiché

Comment on Devoxx France by Cédric Champeau

Cédric Champeau — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:02:48 +0000

Il n’y aurait pas une erreur dans les exemples ? 13, ça devrait être “1Foo”, non ?

Comment on Université du SI 2011 by Eric Le Merdy

Eric Le Merdy — Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:52:37 +0000

David Gageot invente : La Réduction David Gageot. A quand la “Vente Privée David Gageot” ou le “Groupon David Gageot”. Exclusif et avantageux, très fort.

Comment on Soirée spéciale Tests Avancés au Paris JUG by ProxiAD vous parle d’IT » Java Test news » Paris JUG du 11 Janvier: Tu testes pas ? T’es so 2010 !

Sat, 15 Jan 2011 13:49:15 +0000

[...] David Gageot a la dure tâche d’animer toute la soirée, dédiée aux tests et en particulier aux moyens d’accélérer l’exécution et le [...]

Comment on Is ‘final’ keyword always safe to add/remove? by David

David — Sat, 15 Jan 2011 09:01:11 +0000

Thank you those who tried to solve and understand this puzzler. We are indeed facing the classical ‘binary numeric promotion in a mixed type ternary expression applied to an integer constant representable in type char’ problem…

Comment on Is ‘final’ keyword always safe to add/remove? by Olivier

Olivier — Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:54:51 +0000

Oops, Jcs’s comment had not been yet moderated when I posted mine…